Because doctors once totally misunderstood these lethal diseases, they used to treat them in some truly horrifying ways.
Wikimedia Commons
raw Revelation of Saint John the Divine abouthow HIV / AIDS first arrive in the United Statesrecently debunk the long - maintain belief that a individual man — identified in pedantic literature as Patient Zero — stood at the epicenter of the 1980s epidemic .
Some 30 years afterward , it turn out that the man call Patient Zero was never such : The label on his file was not the phone number zero but the letter “ O , ” signaling that the someone was from “ Outside California , ” the state where researchers thought the crisis originated . Indeed , the very notion of Patient Zero was put up from a misprint .
Wikimedia Commons
That ’s hardly the first clip medicine has dumbfound an root narrative wrong : In fact , it look that skill has a chronicle of getting things wrong the first time around — and a passel of that has to do with the role of existing impression set and prejudices .
Here are five other crushing diseases whose bloodline medical experts got entirely wrong :
Syphilis
U.S. National Library of Medicine
The ancient earthly concern recognized both the plague and what we now call syphilis as “ pestilence , ” as both disease moved rapidly , overwhelmed population with human death and defacement , and confounded aesculapian professionals whose humoural theories could n’t seem to explain the disease out .
By the previous 1400s , when Christopher Columbus and his crew of straw hat purportedly brought syphilis ( “ The Gallic Disease , ” as it would afterwards become known ) to Europe , it became obvious that it was sexually transmitted . And presently enough , the powers that be decided that womenspread the disease — specifically “ cleaning lady of ill reputation , ” or fancy woman .
U.S. National Library of Medicine
While existing aesculapian scientific discipline indeed had a handle on the mode of transmission , social and institutional sexism retain to order that fair sex place upright at the rootage of all genital disease , including syphilis .
Well into the 20th century , in both Europe and the United States , this consensus play a huge role in how expert explained syphilis to the world , and how they proposed that the public combat such a disease . Indeed , experts urgedfemale sex workers to “ quell clean;”they did not advise the same to the manpower who assay their services .
This consensus extend into the lab room . for develop intervention for the disease — which ordinarily involved doses of mercury — physicians would experiment on hospitalized prostitutes by giving them syph .
One attempt at “ syphilization ” theorized that one could be inoculated against the disease similarly to smallpox . So throughout the mid-19th century , doctorsregularly infect sporting lady with syphilisin the hope that they would develop an immunity . The trouble was , many if not most of the women they experiment on already had syphilis — so their research offered little more than dubious value .
