ANetherlandsmuseum is facing criticism for pick out anAI - return piece of artto temporarily take the position of the renowned Girl with a Pearl Earring painting . The artwork was make by Johannes Vermeer in 1665 and is usually situate at the Mauritshuis Museum but is on loanword at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam until June 4 .
In the lag , the Mauritshuis Museum held a contention for local artists to submit their own versions of the Girl with a Pearl Earring painting and said it would choose one of the submissions to take Vermeer ’s property until the picture is returned . While the competition may have seemed like a square and exciting process , when the museum select an AI - generated piece of art showing the girl with more integrated and sharp synopsis and glowing earring , the fine art community erupt with ailment .
Of the around 3,480 artworks submitted , Berlin - based creative person , Julian van Dieken , was one of five winners selected , and whose so - called picture is receiving backlash from creative person and buff of the painting . They argue against AI paintings , saying they are not nontextual matter and van Dieken ’s meekness took the place of someone who had put forward more time and effort to make a hand - drawn copy .
Photo: AP News (AP)
“ AI prompters are not artist and their AI - beget plate images should not be praise by the artistic community of interests . Does no one at the museum understand how AI images are created ? How the AI learns to create them ? * * * AI images are plagiarization * * * , how can you knowingly participate in that ? So f*cking disappointing , ” one person comment on the museum ’s Instagrampost .
When asked for input , the Mauritshuis Museum direct Gizmodo to astatementon its website which said they did not pick out the winner by looking at what was the “ most beautiful ” or “ best ” meekness . “ For us , the starting decimal point has always been that the maker has been inspired by Johannes Vermeer ’s world - noted house painting . And that can be in the most divers ways in image or technique . ”
The My Girl with a Pearl opening invited creative person to subject their interpretations of Vermeer ’s work whether it be a photo , a drawing , an AI image , or a knitted homage , and van Dieken wrote in an Instagrampost , “ I did n’t create the image for a competition but for me . ” He said he had used the AI software , MidJourney , and Photoshop to create his copy of the Girl with a Pearl Earring and say he decided on that direction because it “ is now potential with current technology . ”
Girl with a Pearl is one of Vermeer ’s most far-famed paintings , and while the identity element of the girl remains unsung , researchers are continuously looking for hidden item behind the paint strokes and why he might have created this portrait of a young lady friend .
In 2020 , researchers said they had uncovered more information about Vermeer ’s techniques and the materials he used , but project head and curator Abbie Vandivere toldThe Guardianat the time , “ We still do n’t know incisively who the missy is . ” She continued , “ It is near that some whodunit remain and everyone can reflect about her . It allows people their own personal rendition of the girl ; everyone feels their own connection with the way she match your eyes . ”
van Dieken said in his mail that he does not consider the iconic painting could ever be supersede or replicated with any technology , but write , “ The image I created with the help of AI was mean as a sport court , because I love Vermeer ’s work . ” He bestow , “ As a photographer , I ’ll forever chase that kind of point , mood , and quality of light . ”
FilmsVisual arts
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and culture newsworthiness in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
